![]() |
| A view along the nave from the tower |
Entering St. James’ church through the south door, after I had spoken to Chris Ellis - who works as a Church Buildings Officer at the Diocese of Sheffield and had organised Church Explorers Week - I had 40 minutes before the hourly No. 219 bus back to Doncaster was due in High Melton.
Picking up the church guide, which is in the standard Heritage Inspired style used by very many of the mediaeval churches in South Yorkshire before the initiative ended, I set about taking a systematic photographic record of the principal architectural elements of the church – starting with the 2-bay south arcade, which is part of the church that was established c.1153.
I took a couple of quick snaps of the south aisle, which has its masonry fully exposed but I didn’t further investigate this. Based on my observations of the patterns in the stonework of the external fabric and references to the Corpus of Romanesque Sculpture for Britain and Ireland (CRSBI) and Pevsner, I think that this probably dates to the C12.
The arcade has a very plain round arches with no mouldings, which normally indicates a fairly early date and the capital to the west respond is decorated with simple scallops, but I just took a single photograph and didn’t really take much notice of the details described by the CRSBI.
Standing in the tower looking east down the nave, the narrow and very tall nature of the nave is a feature that led Peter Ryder to suggest that this part of the church is of a pre-Conquest date in Saxon Churches of South Yorkshire, but the chancel arch is hidden by the rood screen.
On the north wall of the tower is a large Carrara marble wall memorial to Thomas Fountayne (d.1709) of High Melton Hall, which has a very lengthy inscription that delves into very many aspects of his life, which is fully recorded in the Parish History leaflet.
Returning to the nave to have a look at the south arcade and the wall of the nave above, there is no break in the pattern of the masonry above the arcade, except around the square headed windows, which are probably part of the C15 alterations in the Perpendicular Gothic style.
The wall adjacent to the blocked north door contains a fragment of masonry with a cross that is stylised with a geometrical form, which is similar to those that I had seen in the walls of the porch and may be part of a grave slab, but this is not mentioned in the church guide.
The font, which has been relocated from the tower to the south aisle, is not mentioned by Pevsner and Historic England (HE) describes it a tapered cylinder without a date, except for the oak cover that they suggest is probably C18; however, the church guide assigns it to the C13 but the Parish History includes it in their description of C12 features.
Moving down to the east end of the arcade, I had a quick look at the east respond, which the CRSBI describes in detail and states that the base and the west face of the capital have been remade, which may explain the origin of the scalloped sections of a capital that have been incorporated into the north window of the nave.
Their description also mentions that the respond and the central pier has remains of red ochre based painted decorations, but I didn’t notice any of these and after taking a photo of the capital to the central column, where the scallop and nailhead details are obviously a lot older than those reproduced on the east respond, I made my way to the chancel.




















































